is getting into. >>> dana, thanks very much. let's bring back our panel. you know, joan, he can't get -- dana connectly says he may look that vote in the house of representatives, so my sense is he's going to act very quickly. has no vote in the u.n. security council because of rurala and china will veto it, no vote among the nato allies, no vote among the arab league, even the friends of the united states, clearly no vote in the house or senate. i think he's going to have to go ahead and do it if he wants to retain that credibility. what is your sense? >> now that they have laid this out there, now that secretary kerry has been so clear that the united states will act, the white house has signaled it would act. if he did not act now, it had not just be bashar al assad. look at the region and the things that would happen form the united states would be viewed as a hollow leadership in the region. here at home, to your point about the president, woulder talking about republicans here, and there's a growing number of republicans, some libertarian, but also a